This is MASSIVE. It entirely confirms the hypothesis I was already working on: the VX effectiveness is NEGATIVE; the incidence they claim to prevent are actually caused by the VX shots themselves. Period. Read on, folks, this is a game changer!
RT @CrohnieGaming@twitter.com
@mdccclxx@twitter.com @YourAlberta@twitter.com @stillgray@twitter.com @thevivafrei@twitter.com https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/alberta-canada-inadvertently-published-quickly-deleted-health-data-exposing-half-vaccinated-deaths-counted-unvaccinated/
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/CrohnieGaming/status/1485427875570356225
Sincere #apologies for freaking out with this tweet, if anyone cares. After further analysis of the data, it turns out the incidence "revealed" is not significative, and the curves simply reflect the general historical incidence of the virus at the time people got vaccinated.
Furthermore, if the incidence "revealed" by these furtive graphs could at most be used to cover short-term side effects by masquerading them into COVID, the numbers lose most (if they had any) significance when related to the huge number of administered doses.
